Contents
IntroductionThe Apache Commons Logging (JCL) provides a Log interface that is intended to be both light-weight and an independent abstraction of other logging toolkits. It provides the middleware/tooling developer with a simple logging abstraction, that allows the user (application developer) to plug in a specific logging implementation. JCL provides thin-wrapper Log implementations for other logging tools, including Log4J, Avalon LogKit (the Avalon Framework's logging infrastructure), JDK 1.4, and an implementation of JDK 1.4 logging APIs (JSR-47) for pre-1.4 systems. The interface maps closely to Log4J and LogKit. Familiarity with high-level details of the relevant Logging implementations is presumed. Quick StartAs far as possible, JCL tries to be as unobtrusive as possible. In most cases, including the (full) commons-logging.jar in the classpath should result in JCL configuring itself in a reasonable manner. There's a good chance that it'll guess (discover) your preferred logging system and you won't need to do any configuration of JCL at all! Note, however, that if you have a particular preference then providing a simple commons-logging.properties file which specifies the concrete logging library to be used is recommended, since (in this case) JCL will log only to that system and will report any configuration problems that prevent that system being used. When no particular logging library is specified then JCL will silently ignore any logging library that it finds but cannot initialise and continue to look for other alternatives. This is a deliberate design decision; no application should fail to run because a "guessed" logging library cannot be used. To ensure an exception is reported when a particular logging library cannot be used, use one of the available JCL configuration mechanisms to force that library to be selected (ie disable JCL's discovery process). ConfigurationThere are two base abstractions used by JCL: Log (the basic logger) and LogFactory (which knows how to create Log instances). Specifying a particular Log implementation is very useful (whether that is one provided by commons-logging or a user-defined one). Specifying a LogFactory implementation other than the default is a subject for advanced users only, so will not be addressed here. The default LogFactory implementation uses the following discovery process to determine what type of Log implementation it should use (the process terminates when the first positive match - in order - is found):
Consult the JCL javadocs for details of the various Log implementations that ship with the component. (The discovery process is also covered in more detail there.) Configuring The Underlying Logging SystemThe JCL SPI can be configured to use different logging toolkits (see above). JCL provides only a bridge for writing log messages. It does not (and will not) support any sort of configuration API for the underlying logging system. Configuration of the behavior of the JCL ultimately depends upon the logging toolkit being used. Please consult the documentation for the chosen logging system. JCL is NOT responsible for initialisation, configuration or shutdown of the underlying logging library. In many cases logging libraries will automatically initialise/configure themselves when first used, and need no explicit shutdown process. In these situations an application can simply use JCL and not depend directly on the API of the underlying logging system in any way. However if the logging library being used requires special initialisation, configuration or shutdown then some logging-library-specific code will be required in the application. JCL simply forwards logging method calls to the correct underlying implementation. When writing library code this issue is of course not relevant as the calling application is responsible for handling such issues. Configuring Log4JLog4J is a very commonly used logging implementation (as well as being the JCL primary default), so a few details are presented herein to get the developer/integrator going. Please see the Log4J Home for more details on Log4J and it's configuration. Configure Log4J using system properties and/or a properties file:
Developing With JCLObtaining a Log ObjectTo use the JCL SPI from a Java class, include the following import statements:
import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory; Note that some components using JCL may either extend Log, or provide a component-specific LogFactory implementation. Review the component documentation for guidelines on how commons-logging should be used in such components. For each class definition, declare and initialize a log attribute as follows: public class CLASS { private Log log = LogFactory.getLog(CLASS.class); ... ; Note that for application code, declaring the log member as "static" is more efficient as one Log object is created per class, and is recommended. However this is not safe to do for a class which may be deployed via a "shared" classloader in a servlet or j2ee container or similar environment. If the class may end up invoked with different thread-context-classloader values set then the member must not be declared static. The use of "static" should therefore be avoided in code within any "library" type project. Logging a MessageMessages are logged to a logger, such as log by invoking a method corresponding to priority. The org.apache.commons.logging.Log interface defines the following methods for use in writing log/trace messages to the log: log.fatal(Object message); log.fatal(Object message, Throwable t); log.error(Object message); log.error(Object message, Throwable t); log.warn(Object message); log.warn(Object message, Throwable t); log.info(Object message); log.info(Object message, Throwable t); log.debug(Object message); log.debug(Object message, Throwable t); log.trace(Object message); log.trace(Object message, Throwable t); Semantics for these methods are such that it is expected that the severity, from highest to lowest, of messages is ordered as above. In addition to the logging methods, the following are provided for code guards: log.isFatalEnabled(); log.isErrorEnabled(); log.isWarnEnabled(); log.isInfoEnabled(); log.isDebugEnabled(); log.isTraceEnabled(); Serialization IssuesPrior to release 1.0.4, none of the standard Log implementations were Serializable. If you are using such a release and have a Serializable class with a member that is of type Log then it is necessary to declare that member to be transient and to ensure that the value is restored on deserialization. The recommended approach is to define a custom readObject method on the class which reinitializes that member. In release 1.0.4, all standard Log implementations are Serializable. This means that class members of type Log do not need to be declared transient; on deserialization the Log object will "rebind" to the same category for the same logging library. Note that the same underlying logging library will be used on deserialization as was used in the original object, even if the application the object was deserialized into is using a different logging library. There is one exception; LogKitLogger (adapter for the Avalon LogKit library) is not Serializable for technical reasons. Custom Log implementations not distributed with commons-logging may or may not be Serializable. If you wish your code to be compatible with any arbitrary log adapter then you should follow the advice given above for pre-1.0.4 releases. Jars Included in the Standard Distributioncommons-logging.jarThe commons-logging.jar file includes the JCL API, the default LogFactory implementation and thin-wrapper Log implementations for Log4J, Avalon LogKit, the Avalon Framework's logging infrastructure, JDK 1.4, as well as an implementation of JDK 1.4 logging APIs (JSR-47) for pre-1.4 systems. In most cases, including commons-logging.jar and your preferred logging implementation in the classpath should be all that is required to use JCL. commons-logging-api.jarThe commons-logging-api.jar file includes the JCL API and the default LogFactory implementation as well as the built-in Log implementations SimpleLog and NoOpLog. However it does not include the wrapper Log implementations that require additional libraries such as Log4j, Avalon and Lumberjack. This jar is intended for use by projects that recompile the commons-logging source using alternate java environments, and cannot compile against all of the optional libraries that the Apache release of commons-logging supports. Because of the reduced dependencies of this jarfile, such projects should be able to create an equivalent of this library with fewer difficulties. This jar is also useful for build environments that automatically track dependencies, and thus have difficulty with the concept that the main commons-logging.jar has "optional" dependencies on various logging implementations that can safely go unsatisfied at runtime. commons-logging-adapters.jarThe commons-logging-adapters.jar file includes only adapters to third-party logging implementations, and none of the core commons-logging framework. As such, it cannot be used alone; either commons-logging.jar or commons-logging-api.jar must also be present in the classpath. This library will not often be used; it is only intended for situations where a container has deployed commons-logging-api.jar in a shared classpath but a webapp wants to bind logging to one of the external logging implementations that the api jar does not include. In this situation, deploying the commons-logging.jar file within the webapp can cause problems as this leads to duplicates of the core commons-logging classes (Log, LogFactory, etc) in the classpath which in turn can cause unpleasant ClassCastException exceptions to occur. Deploying only the adapters avoids this problem. JCL Best PracticesBest practices for JCL are presented in two categories: General and Enterprise. The general principles are fairly clear.Enterprise practices are a bit more involved and it is not always as clear as to why they are important. Enterprise best-practice principles apply to middleware components and tooling that is expected to execute in an "Enterprise" level environment. These issues relate to Logging as Internationalization, and fault detection. Enterprise requires more effort and planning, but are strongly encouraged (if not required) in production level systems. Different corporate enterprises/environments have different requirements, so being flexible always helps. Best Practices (General)Code GuardsCode guards are typically used to guard code that only needs to execute in support of logging, that otherwise introduces undesirable runtime overhead in the general case (logging disabled). Examples are multiple parameters, or expressions (e.g. string + " more") for parameters. Use the guard methods of the form log.is<Priority>() to verify that logging should be performed, before incurring the overhead of the logging method call. Yes, the logging methods will perform the same check, but only after resolving parameters. Message Priorities/LevelsIt is important to ensure that log message are appropriate in content and severity. The following guidelines are suggested:
Best Practices (Enterprise)Logging ExceptionsThe general rule in dealing with exceptions is to assume that the user (developer using a tooling/middleware API) isn't going to follow the rules. Since any problems that result are going to be assigned to you, it's in your best interest to be prepared with the proactive tools necessary to demonstrate that your component works correctly, or at worst that the problem can be analyzed from your logs. For this discussion, we must make a distinction between different types of exceptions based on what kind of boundaries they cross:
When Info Level Instead of Debug?You want to have exception/problem information available for first-pass problem determination in a production level enterprise application without turning on debug as a default log level. There is simply too much information in debug to be appropriate for day-to-day operations. More Control of Enterprise Exception LoggingIf more control is desired for the level of detail of these 'enterprise' exceptions, then consider creating a special logger just for these exceptions: Log log = LogFactory.getLog("org.apache.component.enterprise"); This allows the 'enterprise' level information to be turned on/off explicitly by most logger implementations. National Language Support And InternationalizationNLS internationalization involves looking up messages from a message file by a message key, and using that message for logging. There are various tools in Java, and provided by other components, for working with NLS messages. NLS enabled components are particularly appreciated (that's an open-source-correct term for 'required by corporate end-users' :-) for tooling and middleware components. NLS internationalization SHOULD be strongly considered for used for fatal, error, warn, and info messages. It is generally considered optional for debug and trace messages. Perhaps more direct support for internationalizing log messages can be introduced in a future or alternate version of the Log interface. Classloader and Memory ManagementThe LogFactory discovery process (see Configuration above) is a fairly expensive operation, so JCL certainly should not perform it each time user code invokes: LogFactory.getLog() Instead JCL caches the LogFactory implementation created as a result of the discovery process and uses the cached factory to return Log objects. Since in J2EE and similar multi-classloader environments, the result of the discovery process can vary depending on the thread context classloader (e.g. one webapp in a web container may be configured to use Log4j and another to use JDK 1.4 logging), JCL internally caches the LogFactory instances in a static hashtable, keyed by classloader. While this approach is efficient, it can lead to memory leaks if container implementors are not careful to call LogFactory.release() whenever a classloader that has utilized JCL is undeployed. If release() is not called, a reference to the undeployed classloader (and thus to all the classes loaded by it) will be held in LogFactory's static hashtable. Beginning with JCL 1.1, LogFactory caches factory implementations in a "WeakHashtable". This class is similar to java.util.WeakHashMap in that it holds a WeakReference to each key (but a strong reference to each value), thus allowing classloaders to be GC'd even if LogFactory.release() is never invoked. Because WeakHashtable depends on JDK 1.3+ features, it is dynamically loaded depending on the JVM version; when commons-logging is run on java versions prior to 1.3 the code defaults to a standard Hashtable instead. If a custom LogFactory implementation is used, however, then a WeakHashtable alone can be insufficient to allow garbage collection of a classloader without a call to release. If the abstract class LogFactory is loaded by a parent classloader and a concrete subclass implementation of LogFactory is loaded by a child classloader, the WeakHashtable's key is a weak reference to the TCCL (child classloader), but the value is a strong reference to the LogFactory instance, which in turn contains a strong reference to its class and thus loading classloader - the child classloader. This chain of strong references prevents the child loader from being garbage collected. If use of a custom LogFactory subclass is desired, ensuring that the custom subclass is loaded by the same classloader as LogFactory will prevent problems. In normal deployments, the standard implementations of LogFactory found in package org.apache.commons.logging.impl will be loaded by the same classloader that loads LogFactory itself, so use of the standard LogFactory implementation should not pose problems. Alternatively, use the provided ServletContextCleaner to ensure this reference is explicitly released on webapp unload. Extending Commons LoggingJCL is designed to encourage extensions to be created that add functionality. Typically, extensions to JCL fall into two categories:
ContractWhen creating new implementations for Log and LogFactory, it is important to understand the implied contract between the factory and the log implementations:
Creating a Log ImplementationThe minimum requirement to integrate with another logger is to provide an implementation of the org.apache.commons.logging.Log interface. In addition, an implementation of the org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory interface can be provided to meet specific requirements for connecting to, or instantiating, a logger. The default LogFactory provided by JCL can be configured to instantiate a specific implementation of the org.apache.commons.logging.Log interface by setting the property of the same name (org.apache.commons.logging.Log). This property can be specified as a system property, or in the commons-logging.properties file, which must exist in the CLASSPATH. Creating A LogFactory ImplementationIf desired, the default implementation of the org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory interface can be overridden, allowing the JDK 1.3 Service Provider discovery process to locate and create a LogFactory specific to the needs of the application. Review the Javadoc for the LogFactoryImpl.java for details. A Quick Guide To Simple LogJCL is distributed with a very simple Log implementation named org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SimpleLog. This is intended to be a minimal implementation and those requiring a fully functional open source logging system are directed to Log4J. SimpleLog sends all (enabled) log messages, for all defined loggers, to System.err. The following system properties are supported to configure the behavior of this logger:
In addition to looking for system properties with the names specified above, this implementation also checks for a class loader resource named "simplelog.properties", and includes any matching definitions from this resource (if it exists). Frequently Asked QuestionsSee the FAQ document on the commons-logging wiki site |